You have to love SI’s Logic

Oklahoma State’s rapid ascent up the college football ladder

I think this is my problem with the whole thing. They all but admit they went on a which hunt.  And if after 10 months they were not able to find any proof, then it just isn’t out there.

“We wanted to take a comprehensive look at a big-time program, particularly one that made a rapid ascent.

There’s obviously a steady drumbeat of scandal in college sports – improper benefits here; a recruiting violation there – and plenty of rumor and hearsay about the unseemly underbelly. For this piece, we were more about venturing inside the factory and seeing how the sausage is made.”

How does a Division I program make such a large leap in such a short time? SI dispatched senior writers George Dohrmann and Thayer Evans to begin searching for the answer.

My problem with that is the “rapid ascent” and “searching for the answer” parts.

Why put them in there? What’s the point of noting that you wanted to try and play “gotcha” with a program on the rise unless that’s your motive? This doesn’t mean that nothing happened but I can’t logically understand why a national publication would come out and say “we were trying to catch people” instead of “here’s a great story.”

I mean, correct me if i’m wrong, but It kind of infers that you weren’t out looking for a great story, you were just looking to take a program down.

You completely ignore the fact that between 2000 and 2012 Oklahoma State upgraded its facilities from “passable 3A Texas school” to “top five in the nation.”

You basically completely dismiss what Gundy has done with the program (and we’re not even going to get into Dana and Monk!) and imply that “Oklahoma State is only good because these things we’re going to write about happened.”

THEN you tell me a bunch of backups got paid and people did drugs and got passing grades and THAT’S why OSU got good?

Curiously I’ve seen no mention of the walk-on QB or the 3-star WR that led OSU to it’s only two 11+ win seasons in forever. There seems to be a bit of a disconnect from what Sports Illustrated said it was trying to find and what it actually found.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s